O
Sacramento, California
← Community
ZoningCommunity discussion

Title 17 Cannabis Land Use Regulations

Sacramento, California

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (14)Opposed (9)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
26
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.

Public comments (26)

SupportiveDale BurneyJun 16, 2026

Testified in support of keeping faith-based organizations on the sensitive use list to ensure fair and equal treatment.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 54:06 →
SupportiveTilman Whale, Jr.Jun 16, 2026

Expressed support for the proposed cannabis ordinance as drafted, highlighting the community services provided by churches.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 55:40 →
OpposedNatalie PriceJun 16, 2026

Expressed opposition to relaxed cannabis buffers, arguing they threaten youth safety and contradict community protections.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 57:10 →
SupportiveRonnie WaltonJun 16, 2026

Urged the council to keep faith-based organizations on the sensitive use list, noting their role in community outreach and youth programs.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 59:22 →
SupportiveDeanna GarciaJun 16, 2026

Expressed support for the proposed cannabis ordinance and the 600-foot buffer.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:01:03 →
SupportiveMaesha BahatiJun 16, 2026

Supported grandfather protections for existing operators and defended the rigor of the conditional use permit process.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:01:20 →
MixedKayleigh OlgersonJun 16, 2026

Spoke on behalf of the Metro Chamber in support of streamlined cannabis rules but opposed adding churches as sensitive uses due to reduced siting options.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:04:34 →
OpposedAaron CardozaJun 16, 2026

Argued against locating cannabis businesses near schools, parks, and churches, linking drugs to neighborhood violence.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:06:32 →
OpposedDaryl CollinsJun 16, 2026

Urged council members to protect children by keeping cannabis away from schools and neighborhoods.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:08:36 →
OpposedTysonJun 16, 2026

Expressed concern that cannabis shops near parks and churches negatively affect youth and increase crime.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:10:03 →
OpposedEric DostyJun 16, 2026

Asked the council to keep cannabis shops away from faith-based centers where youth counseling takes place.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:11:41 →
SupportiveTerry McLeanJun 16, 2026

Urged fair treatment for churches and requested protection from drug-related impacts in neighborhoods.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:12:58 →
SupportiveJohn JohnsonJun 16, 2026

Stated that neighborhoods have worked hard to reduce drug crime and need buffer zones for churches.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:14:36 →
OpposedJohn WinhamJun 16, 2026

Shared personal history with drug incarceration and argued that children should not be exposed to legal cannabis near parks and churches.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:16:04 →
MixedAnhelika SanchezJun 16, 2026

Supported modernizing Title 17 but opposed adding churches as sensitive uses, citing lack of evidence of negative impacts.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:17:53 →
SupportiveMindy GallowayJun 16, 2026

Asked the council to maintain dispensary-to-dispensary buffers to prevent market saturation and protect small businesses.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:19:49 →
SupportiveDaryl HeathJun 16, 2026

Supported keeping churches protected, sharing a personal experience of smoke and odor impacts near a church.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:21:33 →
SupportiveRichard WilloughbyJun 16, 2026

Supported keeping churches on the sensitive use list to protect people recovering from addiction.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:23:19 →
SupportiveDonell RegginsJun 16, 2026

Asked the council to keep faith-based organizations on the sensitive use list in solidarity with community pastors.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:25:10 →
SupportiveEssley SimmonsJun 16, 2026

Asked the council to support including churches and faith-based organizations in the ordinance.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:26:42 →
OpposedCarla BlackJun 16, 2026

Argued for equal protection of all sensitive uses, including daycares, churches, and neighborhoods.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:29:10 →
OpposedZeusJun 16, 2026

A 9-year-old resident asked the council not to locate cannabis businesses next to parks where children play.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:31:25 →
OpposedHoratioJun 16, 2026

Voiced opposition to putting cannabis establishments near youth centers and churches.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:33:05 →
NeutralStig E.Jun 16, 2026

Spoke humorously about drugs already being in parks and expressed support for clubs.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:31:25 →
SupportiveStefan WaltonJun 16, 2026

Requested equal treatment for faith-based organizations in the cannabis ordinance.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:36:31 →
SupportiveBishop Katy WeldonJun 16, 2026

Argued that churches should remain in buffer zones to protect families and low-income populations.

2:00 PM City Council [Supplemental Material - Jun 16, 2026 · 1:38:26 →