Sacramento City Employees' Retirement System (SCERS) Termination and Housing Fund
Sacramento, California
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 21, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Spoke in strong support of the ballot measure, urging the city to use surplus pension funds to create a housing revolving loan fund.
5:00 PM City Council - Jul 21, 2026 · 20:17 →Expressed support for the ballot measure and the creation of a housing revolving fund to help finance housing development.
5:00 PM City Council - Jul 21, 2026 · 22:23 →Supported the housing revolving fund on behalf of Sacramento Area Congregations Together, requesting that funds be prioritized for low-income multifamily housing and developed with stakeholder collaboration.
5:00 PM City Council - Jul 21, 2026 · 23:31 →Supported the ballot measure on behalf of the North State Building Industry Association as a valuable tool to increase housing supply.
5:00 PM City Council - Jul 21, 2026 · 25:34 →Praised the creative problem-solving of using surplus pension funds to create a low-interest housing loan fund during a high-interest-rate environment.
5:00 PM City Council - Jul 21, 2026 · 26:21 →Supported the revolving loan fund, noting that similar models are succeeding in other cities and helping lower rents.
5:00 PM City Council - Jul 21, 2026 · 27:32 →Spoke as vice chair of the Planning and Design Commission in a personal capacity to support the ballot measure, noting that capital gaps are currently stalling development.
5:00 PM City Council - Jul 21, 2026 · 29:15 →Supported the proposal on behalf of the Sacramento Housing Alliance, recommending a focus on low-income households and pre-development costs.
5:00 PM City Council - Jul 21, 2026 · 30:26 →Suggested exploring a public bank backed by the FDIC to maximize the impact of the funds for affordable housing and shelter preservation.
5:00 PM City Council - Jul 21, 2026 · 32:20 →