Resolution Establishing Business Operating Permit Fees for Cannabis Consumption Lounges
Sacramento, California
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 23, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Supported the zoning amendments but opposed the proposed consumption lounge fees as excessive and duplicative.
2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:20:10 →Supported the lounge pilot program but raised concerns over high fee structures and rapid fee increases.
2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:21:41 →Supported zoning changes but asked the council to lower the proposed fees for cannabis businesses.
2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:24:01 →Supported Title 17 updates but opposed proposed permit fees for cannabis consumption lounges.
2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:25:02 →Supported Title 17 amendments but opposed high permit fees that hinder pilot participation.
2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:26:27 →Supported the consumption lounge ordinance but urged a more measured, lower fee structure.
2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:29:56 →Supported the consumption lounge ordinance and urged adoption of the lower March fee structure for the pilot program.
2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:31:23 →