O
Sacramento, California
← Community
Taxes BudgetCommunity discussion

Resolution Establishing Business Operating Permit Fees for Cannabis Consumption Lounges

Sacramento, California

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (1)Concerned (5)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 23, 2026.

Public comments (7)

ConcernedKimberly CargyleJun 23, 2026

Supported the zoning amendments but opposed the proposed consumption lounge fees as excessive and duplicative.

2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:20:10 →
ConcernedJosh LewisJun 23, 2026

Supported the lounge pilot program but raised concerns over high fee structures and rapid fee increases.

2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:21:41 →
ConcernedDeanna GarciaJun 23, 2026

Supported zoning changes but asked the council to lower the proposed fees for cannabis businesses.

2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:24:01 →
OpposedKayleigh OlgersonJun 23, 2026

Supported Title 17 updates but opposed proposed permit fees for cannabis consumption lounges.

2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:25:02 →
ConcernedMindy GallowayJun 23, 2026

Supported Title 17 amendments but opposed high permit fees that hinder pilot participation.

2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:26:27 →
ConcernedAnhelika SanchezJun 23, 2026

Supported the consumption lounge ordinance but urged a more measured, lower fee structure.

2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:29:56 →
SupportiveKevin McCartyJun 23, 2026

Supported the consumption lounge ordinance and urged adoption of the lower March fee structure for the pilot program.

2:00 PM City Council - Jun 23, 2026 · 1:31:23 →