O
Sacramento, California
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Proposed North Natomas Microcommunity Concerns

Sacramento, California

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (4)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 3, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedLena SheaMar 3, 2026

Expressed strong anxiety and opposition regarding the proposed microcommunity in North Natomas, citing close proximity to schools, residential areas, and parks.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Mar 3, 2026 · 45:49 →
OpposedDavid WeitzelMar 3, 2026

Raised concerns about the lack of basic amenities like indoor plumbing in the proposed tiny homes and potential negative impacts on nearby senior mobile home parks.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Mar 3, 2026 · 47:48 →
OpposedMichael McKennaMar 3, 2026

Objected to the Natomas microcommunity project, warning of negative impacts on quiet family and senior residential areas.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Mar 3, 2026 · 52:14 →
OpposedRazi LearMar 3, 2026

Questioned the legality and financial planning behind the microcommunity project given the city's budget deficit.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Mar 3, 2026 · 54:22 →
ConcernedGary Fleshman CupaderaMar 3, 2026

Discussed concerns about security, accessibility, and animal limits at the proposed Natomas microcommunity and requested public review of alternative proposals.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:06:41 →