Memorandum of Understanding with Sacramento Zoological Society
Sacramento, California
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 10
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Apr 28, 2026.
Public comments (10)
Expressed support for participating in the working group and ensuring proper oversight.
5:00 PM City Council [Amendment Material - Apr 28, 2026 · 58:08 →Expressed support for exploring zoo expansion to enhance local assets.
5:00 PM City Council [Amendment Material - Apr 28, 2026 · 42:44 →Expressed concern about losing public parkland and requested the council not approve the zoo expansion MOU.
5:00 PM City Council [Amendment Material - Apr 28, 2026 · 43:20 →Spoke in favor of the zoo expansion as a board trustee to support education and conservation missions.
5:00 PM City Council [Amendment Material - Apr 28, 2026 · 44:59 →Urged caution and consideration of historic conditions and park usage during the expansion study.
5:00 PM City Council [Amendment Material - Apr 28, 2026 · 47:03 →Expressed concern over the potential destruction of the historic Swanston Memorial Fountain and Garden.
5:00 PM City Council [Amendment Material - Apr 28, 2026 · 49:11 →Stressed that the MOU maps should be treated as a starting point rather than a final vote.
5:00 PM City Council [Amendment Material - Apr 28, 2026 · 53:05 →Raised technical points about CEQA sequencing and protection of the WPA-built park features.
5:00 PM City Council [Amendment Material - Apr 28, 2026 · 53:29 →Represented Upper Land Park neighbors supporting the study while urging strict protection of historic landscaping and a clear business plan.
5:00 PM City Council [Amendment Material - Apr 28, 2026 · 55:49 →Spoke as Land Park Community Association president in support of a thoughtful engagement process.
5:00 PM City Council [Amendment Material - Apr 28, 2026 · 59:54 →