O
Sacramento, California
← Community
Parks RecCommunity discussion

infrastructure

Sacramento, California

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)

At a glance

Public comments
1
Last 30 days
1

Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 13, 2026.

Public comments (19)

SupportiveXavier ThompsonOct 13, 2026

Expressed strong support for the Sacramento River Parkway project and opening the river levee trail.

2:00 PM City Council - Oct 13, 2026 · 1:34:11 →
ConcernedDavid WrightSep 15, 2026

Expressed concern over a large data center project potentially impacting SMUD's zero-carbon goals and called for greater transparency or a moratorium.

5:00 PM City Council - Sep 15, 2026 · 43:13 →
OpposedAnnabelle GonzalezSep 1, 2026

Raised concerns about infrastructure, flood risks, and proximity of proposed shelter sites to schools and parks in Natomas.

2:00 PM City Council - Sep 1, 2026 · 13:02 →
ConcernedRichard WakeAug 18, 2026

Called for updates on requested security and crosswalk improvements at the South Hill Shopping Center.

2:00 PM City Council - Aug 18, 2026 · 46:12 →
NeutralMichael BevinsApr 14, 2026

Discussed design considerations for homeless housing projects and stormwater/sewer resource usage.

5:00 PM City Council - Apr 14, 2026 · 53:20 →
SupportiveShante CampbellMar 24, 2026

Spoke in strong support of the EIFD for District 2, emphasizing that it will fund essential infrastructure like sidewalks and street lights without raising new taxes.

2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 25:58 →
SupportiveAndy HernandezMar 24, 2026

Supported studying the EIFD further, noting that doing business in North Sacramento is challenging due to aging underground infrastructure.

2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 27:48 →
SupportiveRob KurthMar 24, 2026

Urged the council to adopt the EIFD as a strategic investment since the private sector cannot shoulder the high off-site infrastructure costs alone.

2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 29:00 →
ConcernedJustin WilsonMar 24, 2026

Raised concerns that EIFD revenue projections could fall short and jeopardize the general fund, and noted that neighborhoods like Robla are often left out.

2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 30:12 →
SupportiveJohn VinyokiMar 24, 2026

Expressed support for the EIFD as a targeted approach to ring-fence taxes for vital community infrastructure investments.

2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 31:35 →
SupportiveTim SmithMar 24, 2026

Voiced support as a District 2 resident and Measure U Commission representative for moving forward to study the EIFD.

2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 32:32 →
SupportiveNasMar 24, 2026

Spoke as a Del Paso Boulevard business owner in favor of the EIFD to improve lighting, sidewalks, and commercial growth.

2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 32:44 →
SupportiveJohn VinyokiMar 24, 2026

Supported the EIFD as a targeted tool to ring-fence taxes for critical infrastructure investments.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 31:35 →
SupportiveTim SmithMar 24, 2026

Spoke as a District 2 resident and Measure U Commission member in support of authorizing the study.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 32:32 →
SupportiveNasMar 24, 2026

A Del Paso Boulevard business owner who spoke in favor of the EIFD to improve lighting, sidewalks, and business growth.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 32:44 →
SupportiveShante CampbellMar 24, 2026

Spoke in strong support of the EIFD for District 2, emphasizing that it will fund essential infrastructure like sidewalks and streetlights without new taxes.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 25:58 →
SupportiveAndy HernandezMar 24, 2026

Supported studying the EIFD further, noting that doing business in North Sacramento is challenging due to aging underground infrastructure.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 27:48 →
SupportiveRob KurthMar 24, 2026

Urged the council to adopt the EIFD as a strategic investment tool since the private sector cannot clear the high hurdle of off-site infrastructure costs.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 29:00 →
OpposedJustin WilsonMar 24, 2026

Raised concerns about EIFD revenue projections falling short and risking the general fund, noting that neighborhoods like Robla are often left out.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 29:51 →

News & external sources (1)