District 2 Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District (EIFD)
Sacramento, California
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 24, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Spoke in strong support of the EIFD for District 2, emphasizing that it will fund essential infrastructure like sidewalks and street lights without raising new taxes.
2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 25:58 →Supported studying the EIFD further, noting that doing business in North Sacramento is challenging due to aging underground infrastructure.
2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 27:48 →Urged the council to adopt the EIFD as a strategic investment since the private sector cannot shoulder the high off-site infrastructure costs alone.
2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 29:00 →Raised concerns that EIFD revenue projections could fall short and jeopardize the general fund, and noted that neighborhoods like Robla are often left out.
2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 30:12 →Expressed support for the EIFD as a targeted approach to ring-fence taxes for vital community infrastructure investments.
2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 31:35 →Voiced support as a District 2 resident and Measure U Commission representative for moving forward to study the EIFD.
2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 32:32 →Spoke as a Del Paso Boulevard business owner in favor of the EIFD to improve lighting, sidewalks, and commercial growth.
2:00 PM City Council (Special Meeting) - Mar 24, 2026 · 32:44 →