District 2 Enhanced Infrastructure Finance District Discussion
Sacramento, California
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 24, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Supported the EIFD as a targeted tool to ring-fence taxes for critical infrastructure investments.
2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 31:35 →Spoke as a District 2 resident and Measure U Commission member in support of authorizing the study.
2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 32:32 →A Del Paso Boulevard business owner who spoke in favor of the EIFD to improve lighting, sidewalks, and business growth.
2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 32:44 →Spoke in strong support of the EIFD for District 2, emphasizing that it will fund essential infrastructure like sidewalks and streetlights without new taxes.
2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 25:58 →Supported studying the EIFD further, noting that doing business in North Sacramento is challenging due to aging underground infrastructure.
2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 27:48 →Urged the council to adopt the EIFD as a strategic investment tool since the private sector cannot clear the high hurdle of off-site infrastructure costs.
2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 29:00 →Raised concerns about EIFD revenue projections falling short and risking the general fund, noting that neighborhoods like Robla are often left out.
2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 29:51 →