O
Sacramento, California
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

District 2 Enhanced Infrastructure Finance District Discussion

Sacramento, California

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (6)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 24, 2026.

Public comments (7)

SupportiveJohn VinyokiMar 24, 2026

Supported the EIFD as a targeted tool to ring-fence taxes for critical infrastructure investments.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 31:35 →
SupportiveTim SmithMar 24, 2026

Spoke as a District 2 resident and Measure U Commission member in support of authorizing the study.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 32:32 →
SupportiveNasMar 24, 2026

A Del Paso Boulevard business owner who spoke in favor of the EIFD to improve lighting, sidewalks, and business growth.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 32:44 →
SupportiveShante CampbellMar 24, 2026

Spoke in strong support of the EIFD for District 2, emphasizing that it will fund essential infrastructure like sidewalks and streetlights without new taxes.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 25:58 →
SupportiveAndy HernandezMar 24, 2026

Supported studying the EIFD further, noting that doing business in North Sacramento is challenging due to aging underground infrastructure.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 27:48 →
SupportiveRob KurthMar 24, 2026

Urged the council to adopt the EIFD as a strategic investment tool since the private sector cannot clear the high hurdle of off-site infrastructure costs.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 29:00 →
OpposedJustin WilsonMar 24, 2026

Raised concerns about EIFD revenue projections falling short and risking the general fund, noting that neighborhoods like Robla are often left out.

2:00 PM City Council - Mar 24, 2026 · 29:51 →