An Ordinance Deleting and Adding Section 15.148.965 relating to Digital Billboards
Sacramento, California
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 24, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Criticized past stadium infrastructure spending and argued against electronic billboards and luxury housing developments.
5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:03:13 →Spoke for Unite Here Local 49 against the billboard agreement, citing inadequate affordable housing in the Railyards project.
5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:05:22 →Shared personal security concerns living at the Wong Center and advocated for senior and low-income tenant protection.
5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:02:59 →A Railyards resident criticized the council for prioritizing developer profits over seniors and affordable housing.
5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:02:59 →Voiced concern over millions of dollars going to developers while affordable housing remains at 6%.
5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:11:03 →A Railyards resident criticized the project as luxury-dominated and unaffordable for seniors facing recertification.
5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:12:29 →Argued against developer perks and billboards without community benefits, citing displacement concerns.
5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:14:44 →