O
Sacramento, California
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

An Ordinance Deleting and Adding Section 15.148.965 relating to Digital Billboards

Sacramento, California

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (6)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 24, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedKevin BoltzFeb 24, 2026

Criticized past stadium infrastructure spending and argued against electronic billboards and luxury housing developments.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:03:13 →
OpposedSonia CarabelFeb 24, 2026

Spoke for Unite Here Local 49 against the billboard agreement, citing inadequate affordable housing in the Railyards project.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:05:22 →
ConcernedPamela FreemanFeb 24, 2026

Shared personal security concerns living at the Wong Center and advocated for senior and low-income tenant protection.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:02:59 →
OpposedYolanda VillanuevaFeb 24, 2026

A Railyards resident criticized the council for prioritizing developer profits over seniors and affordable housing.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:02:59 →
OpposedFrancisco GarciaFeb 24, 2026

Voiced concern over millions of dollars going to developers while affordable housing remains at 6%.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:11:03 →
OpposedNancy WilliamsFeb 24, 2026

A Railyards resident criticized the project as luxury-dominated and unaffordable for seniors facing recertification.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:12:29 →
OpposedAlex HansonFeb 24, 2026

Argued against developer perks and billboards without community benefits, citing displacement concerns.

5:00 PM City Council [Amended Agenda & Amendment Material - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:14:44 →